Over at Dan the Debunker's blog, I read this little exchange in the 'Ignotheists' post;
Dr. Mabuse: "Is "lying for Christ" a valid reason for lying?"
Dan: "Maybe. Is it a valid reason to lie to save a woman from an abusive husband?"
I couldn't help but think that Dan is comparing Christ to an abusive husband.
There are plenty of similarities there, I must admit, though I'm sure Dan didn't mean it this way.
God: He wouldn't send you to Hell if He didn't love you so Damned much!
EDIT: Dan has since explained that he does NOT see Christ/God as an abusive husband; just thought I'd clear that up.